Health Insurance with a Hillary Garnish on the Side
[Welcome Industry Radar readers!. Please check out some of our other
posts, too]
How would you like your health insurance? How about a little garnish?
Many politicians (and regular folk as well) think the way to universal
coverage is paved with mandates. One such mandate is requiring
everyone to purchase health insurance . . . or else . . .
Mandated health insurance is equated to mandated auto insurance.
But the two are very dissimilar.
Auto insurance is required mostly due to liability. If you wreck your
car and don't have insurance you lose your "investment" in the car.
But if you injure someone in the process, they can incur significant
medical bills, loss of income and even loss of life.
The states have decided if you are going to drive you are going to
have auto insurance.
Some states have already toyed with mandated health insurance. So far
it is a bust.
Now a presidential candidate wants to garnish your wages if you do not
purchase health insurance.
Clinton has not always specified the enforcement measures she would
embrace, but when pressed on ABC's "This Week," she said: "I think
there are a number of mechanisms" that are possible, including "going
after people's wages, automatic enrollment."
Going after your wages.
OK, I suppose . . .
I mean, after all, in many jurisdictions if you fail to pay your
uninsured medical bills your wages can be garnished.
No comments:
Post a Comment