Are Regional Health Information Organizations (RHIOs) Sustainable?
As CEO of the Massachusetts Regional Health Information Organization
(RHIO) called MA-SHARE, I have spent 4 years working with stakeholders
in Massachusetts to create a sustainable business model for health
information exchange.
MA-SHARE's first effort in 2004 was the MedsInfo project, a state-wide
medication history exchange pilot based on payer claims data. We
learned a great deal about privacy, workflow, data expectations, and
health information exchange operations. The project was terminated
after the pilot because participants were not ready to fund the true
cost of ongoing operations given the lack of integration of the data
into clinician workflow and the inherent incompleteness of the data
(only 66% of patients had medication data in our regional payer
databases as of 2004). As of 2007, the two largest national
e-Prescribing exchanges, RxHub and SureScripts, have much more
complete networks and we've integrated the former MedsInfo
functionality into our e-Prescribing utility, described below.
In 2005 and 2006, working with the Markle Foundation and the Office of
the National Coordinator, we developed a Nationwide Health Information
Network implementation pilot based on a state-wide master patient
index called the Record Locator Service. The pilot demonstrated the
value of the emerging clinical data exchange architecture to support
provider-to-provider data exchange, personal health records, and
biosurveillance. The architecture worked well, but the project was
terminated after the pilot because participants were not ready to fund
the true cost of ongoing operations required to maintain the Record
Locator Service.
In 2006 and 2007, we implemented a state-wide e-Prescribing gateway.
We've transmitted over 100,000 electronic prescription transactions
through our exchange and we are live with formulary enforcement,
eligibility checking, dispensed medication history including drug/drug
interaction checking and routing to retail/mail order pharmacies. The
stakeholders have found value in paying for the cost of ongoing
operations of this infrastructure since it reduces costs to the payers
by enhancing the use of generics/formulary medications, it reduces
costs to pharmacies by eliminating paper workflows and it improves
workflow for providers by streamlining renewal workflow. We've
implemented our e-Prescribing gateway at CareGroup, Partners and soon
Children's Hospital. We will work in 2008 to expand the use of the
gateway to connect to vendor systems such as Cerner and Meditech, as
well as to encourage its use in more institutions.
In 2007, we implemented our "push pilot" using national standards to
share discharge summaries and emergency department summaries among
caregivers. We use the same software application that routes
prescriptions between providers and pharmacies to securely route
documents provider to provider. This clinical data exchange approach
is truly low cost and simple. All that is required is a sender which
can summarize tabular and narrative data in the format specified by
HITSP and an organization which can receive this data via direct
integration into an electronic health record, secure email or fax.
Cerner, MEDITECH, eClinicalWorks and GE Centricity are among the EMR
vendors supporting the design and implementation of this project. We
are optimistic that the value to the stakeholders of exchanging
clinical summaries will be sustainable based on cost avoidance. By
eliminating the expense of chart copying, mailing, and paper-based
record storage, hospitals seem willing to fund health information
exchange of summaries out of projected cost savings. It's also a great
political win for the hospital, since pushing clinical summaries keeps
the primary caregivers and referring physicians well informed,
enhancing their satisfaction. It provides care continuity by ensuring
all caregivers (inpatient, outpatient, Emergency Department,
rehabilitation, and long term care facilities) are given a consistent
medication list, problem list, laboratory summary, and discharge
narrative. As personal health record services such as Microsoft
HealthVault, Google's Health efforts and Dossia through Indivo Health
are more widely deployed, we may also push data directly into personal
health repositories at patient request.
MA-SHARE's budget in 2008 is approaching the same kind of
sustainablity we've achieved with our financial data exchange, NEHEN.
All 'lights on' operations are funded by the stakeholders plus
$250,000 is available each year for new projects and enhancements. No
grant funding or soft money source will be used in 2008. Our hope is
that more stakeholders will sign up to participate in MA-SHARE over
time, further funding research and development of high value health
information exchange products for our community. The big lesson
learned in our statewide initiatives, MA-Share and NEHEN, is that
grant funding and large stakeholder (academic medical centers/payers)
contributions precede sustainability. To achieve sustainability, the
initial efforts must be expanded to meet the needs of the common
marketplace. We believe our push model addresses this issue.
Health Information Exchanges in the US are in tenuous financial shape.
We've been exploring sustainable business models in Massachusetts for
4 years. Many RHIOs still depend on grants, which eventually end and
thus are not a good business model. I believe that Health Information
Exchanges will evolve to meet the local business needs of many
communities but that a nationwide health information network linking
together these local exchanges will not be widely deployed until more
consistent funding is available. In many ways, data exchange is a
public good, which is hard to support entirely from local
stakeholders. Additional funding from federal and state sources would
help. The level of investment in healthcare information exchange in
Canada and the UK far exceeds that in the US. I hope that Bush's 2004
commitment to have every clinician in the country wired by 2014 will
No comments:
Post a Comment